AI-assisted case research for attorneys
Cases on point for your research question — $99 per topic
Send us one legal question with your jurisdiction and facts. We search CourtListener, read the opinions, and return the real cases that fit — each linked, quoted verbatim and explained — with a research memo.
- ✔ Only cases actually retrieved from CourtListener
- ✔ Every quote checked against the opinion text
- ✔ Federal circuits and all 50 states
- ✔ Pay per topic with PayPal — no subscription
Example result
Lee Rice, II v. Dale Morehouse
989 F.3d 1112 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 8, 2021
“a reasonable jury could find that Rice engaged in passive resistance and that Morehouse’s and Shaffer’s take-down of Rice involved unconstitutionally excessive force”
Why it’s on point: a minor traffic stop, refusals to comply without threats, and a take-down — qualified immunity denied.
View on CourtListener →
Research in three steps
Built for busy litigators who need a fast, reliable first pass at the case law — without wading through hundreds of search results.
Ask one question
State the legal question, the jurisdiction and court level, the key facts and the position you want to support. An automatic scope check makes sure it is a single topic before you pay.
Pay $99 with PayPal
One flat fee per research topic. Research starts only after PayPal confirms the payment — no subscriptions, no hourly billing.
Get cases on point
A ranked list of real opinions with citations, holdings, fact comparisons, verbatim quotes and links, plus a concise research memo you can print or save as PDF.
Real cases only — verified, not invented
AI tools that “remember” case law can make up citations. It’s On Point works the other way round: the cases come first, from CourtListener, and the AI only reads and explains what was retrieved.
Step 1
Retrieve
Search queries planned from your request run against CourtListener’s case-law API with your court and date filters.
Step 2
Read
The full text of the strongest candidates is fetched and read, not just search snippets.
Step 3
Analyse
Claude, Anthropic’s AI model, scores each opinion’s relevance and explains how it helps or hurts your position — using only that opinion’s text.
Step 4
Verify
Every case, citation and quote is checked against what was retrieved. Anything that doesn’t match is removed before you see it.
What your report includes
- ✔ Ranked cases with name, citation, court and date
- ✔ Relevance score and label — directly on point, closely related, analogous or distinguishing
- ✔ Holding summary and how the facts compare to yours
- ✔ Helps or hurts your stated position
- ✔ Verbatim quote taken only from the opinion text
- ✔ Link to each opinion on CourtListener
- ✔ Research memo — short answer, analysis, gaps and next steps
One topic per request
Each request covers one legal question and gets the pipeline’s full attention. Working on several issues? Submit a request for each — they run side by side. Unpaid requests can be cancelled at any time.
$99 per research topic
Have a research question ready?
Create your attorney account and submit it in a few minutes.
AI-assisted research for licensed attorneys. Verify all authorities before relying on them. Not legal advice. Case law courtesy of CourtListener (Free Law Project).